Skip to main content
March 2018
NSPE Speaks; Financial Engineering
You Said It

March/April 2018

You Said It

NSPE Speaks

I ordered the Tinker Crate and Doodle Crate for my kids after I listened to your last podcast. They’ve got two crates so far and LOVE them! Thanks for the great idea.

Leanne Panduren, P.E., F.NSPE
Flint, MI

 

Financial Engineering

I recently saw an ad for a degree in financial engineering and looked it up. Wikipedia defines it as follows: “Financial engineering is a multidisciplinary field involving financial theory, methods of engineering, tools of mathematics and the practice of programming.” A YouTube video admits it is not a recognized field of engineering. I guess it ranks up there with “train engineer” and “sanitation engineer” (garbage collector). When the term “engineer” has been so diluted, we should concentrate on using the term “professional engineer” rather than trying to push against the tide that has diluted the term “engineer.”

John Kampmeyer, P.E., F.NSPE
Springfield, PA


This is why professional engineers shouldn’t ever simply call themselves engineers. When a PE is asked what they do, their default response should be “professional engineer.” If asked what that is, they can further elaborate on specifics and take advantage of the opportunity to further differentiate a professional engineer from an engineer, a term that marketing departments have diluted to include any position they feel like “adding a bit of bling” to the title of.

Jack Kettler, P.E.
Pocatello, ID


Over the past 40 plus years I have enjoyed engineering to the fullest and encouraged many others to join in. But what has been disturbing to me is not the engineering but the overall obsession with the professional engineer title, being promoted as a prestigious title to have after your name, even if you never use it. If you don’t use it for why it was created, for those providing engineering services directly to the public, then you are not a professional engineer and you shouldn’t be masquerading as one. The problem is we have an identity issue, we want the professional engineer title to mean something more than for what it was created. We want it to mean we are more knowledgeable, invincible, we never make mistakes. We want the glory we perceive is held by a doctor or lawyer. We don’t understand that greatness does not come from self-proclamation or from the level of education we achieve; it comes from what we produce and how we apply it, what we contribute to the betterment of society. Perhaps we should change the name to “public engineer” so that the focus is on the public and not ourselves.

John Pollock, P.E.
Cleburne, TX

 

Excited to welcome Rep. Kevin Vaughan, PE (@wkevinv) to the TN House of Representatives. Great to have a Professional Engineer in the House! #TNLegTNSPE

@TNSPE Jan 9

Excited to welcome Rep. Kevin Vaughan, PE (@wkevinv) to the TN House of Representatives. Great to have a Professional Engineer in the House! #TNLeg

 

Nevada Society of Professional Engineers STEM and Brownies~ — at Girl Scouts of Southern Nevada.Nevada Society of Professional Engineers

STEM and Brownies~ — at Girl Scouts of Southern Nevada.

 

Don’t miss out on the discussion in NSPE’s online Communities for professional engineers. Engage with your peers on issues of professional importance. Visit https://community.nspe.org.

Join the Conversation

There’s no shortage of ways to connect with the Society as well as other members. NSPE’s Communities, Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, and Instagram all help you make that connection. Or you can write a letter or send an e-mail to the address below.

On this page, we’ll show you some highlights of what people are saying. Keep in mind, however, that the views expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of and should not be attributable to the National Society of Professional Engineers.

Share Your PE Experience with NSPE

         

More You Said It Articles
Managing Engineers

January/February 2018

Finding a Guide

November/December 2017

Nurture and Support; The Citizen Engineer

September/October 2017

A Worrisome Workplace: Readers Respond

July/August 2017

PE License Benefits; Transparency Needed; Check Your Spelling

May/June 2017

You Said It

Regulations and the PE; Advice for a ChemE Grad

March/April 2017

Lifelong Learning; PEs in Industry; American Society of Plumbing Engineers

January/February 2017

But Can They Think; Protecting a Good Name; The Profession of Tomorrow

November/December 2016

Protected Content
Flint Case Study; Graduate Degree 
Not the Only Answer

September/October 2016

Protected Content
The Meaning of ‘E’; You’re Not Alone; End the Exemption; Four Years Not Enough

July/August 2016

Letters

Protected Content
Conflicts of Interest; The Strength of the PE; Behind the Wheel

May/June 2016

Letters

Protected Content
Bridging the Structural Divide

March/April 2016

Protected Content