Skip to main content
September 2014
NCEES Addresses Confidentiality and Unethical Conduct
On Ethics

August/September 2014

ON ETHICS
NCEES Addresses Confidentiality and Unethical Conduct

Are professional engineers and professional surveyors who use confidential information of an employee or client for personal gain engaged in ethical misconduct?

That’s the question state licensing boards were scheduled to vote on at the annual meeting of the National Council of Examiners for Engineering and Surveying, August 20–23 in Seattle.

The NCEES 2013–14 Committee on Law Enforcement found that the Model Rules (240.15 B.4) bar disclosure of confidential information by professional engineers and licensed surveyors, absent the client’s consent (or as required by the law). However, the rules don’t specifically address a licensed professional’s use of this information.

The committee issued a report and is recommending an addition to the rules to specify that a licensee is prohibited from using confidential information acquired through professional engagements or activities for personal profit without the explicit consent of the client or employer. The rule will not restrict a licensee’s use of general information that relates to engineering or surveying that is gathered through engagement with the client or employer. Examples of confidential information include proprietary business affairs or technical processes and specialized knowledge that relate to a particular situation or application.

The NSPE Code of Ethics compels engineers in the fulfillment of their professional duties to act for each employer or client as faithful agents or trustees. The Code’s Rules of Practice also calls for the following:

4. Engineers shall not disclose, without consent, confidential information concerning the business affairs or technical processes of any present or former client or employer, or public body on which they serve.

a. Engineers shall not, without the consent of all interested parties, promote or arrange for new employment or practice in connection with a specific project for which the engineer has gained particular and specialized knowledge.

b. Engineers shall not, without the consent of all interested parties, participate in or represent an adversary interest in connection with a specific project or proceeding in which the engineer has gained particular specialized knowledge on behalf of a former client or employer.

MORE Issue 4 2024 ARTICLES
Regulartions
Navigating Ethical Responsibilities Amidst Evolving Regulations

Spencer Rojas

Submitted by barbaraellenparker on
Spencer
Rojas
,

Tommy Sokolowski

Submitted by barbaraellenparker on
Tommy
Sokolowski

Given recent legal and regulatory changes, professional engineers face a complex landscape impact

Harry Hughes, PE
Wyoming PE Recaptures Ethics Contest Victory

Issue 3 2024

Protected Content
Public Trust
The Professional Trust Factor

Winter 2024

Protected Content
NSPE Ethics Resources

Fall 2023

Protected Content
How to Avoid Doing Bad Things for Good Reasons: Lessons from a Study of Professional Engineers

Spring 2023

Protected Content
Ethics
A Source of Inspiration

Winter 2023

Protected Content
Ethical Business Culture is Stronger After Pandemic

Spring 2022

Protected Content
Engineering’s Public-Protection Predicament

Winter 2022

Protected Content
Book Takes a Deep Dive into Code of Ethics

Fall 2021

Protected Content
Aspiring Global Engineers Require Unique Ethics Training, Study Says

Summer 2021

Protected Content
The Unnatural But Ethical Act of Admitting Mistakes

Spring 2021

New Ethics Approaches Needed as New Technologies Grow

Winter 2021

Protected Content