Skip to main content
September 2014
Interactive Activities Most Effective in Promoting Learning
PE Community: Education

August/September 2014

COMMUNITIES: EDUCATION
Interactive Activities Most Effective in Promoting Learning

Studies often show active teaching methods that engage students in the learning process improve learning compared to more passive methods. Yet some studies have demonstrated the opposite.

Researchers from Arizona State University and two other institutions collaborated on a study designed to address problems with prior research on learning activity types.

The study focused on engineering education and examined the following types of learning activities:

  • Passive. A student receives instruction, for example by listening to a lecture or watching a video.

  • Active. A student manipulates information overtly, such as highlighting sentences while reading or looking for specific information in a text or problem.

  • Constructive. A student generates knowledge beyond the materials, for instance by posing a research question or comparing and contrasting situations.

  • Interactive. Two or more students work together on activities that develop knowledge and extend understanding, such as by studying in pairs or defending their position with evidence.

Studies in an engineering classroom and within a controlled environment both found interactive learning, in which students can offer complementary knowledge and build on each other’s understanding, most effective, followed by constructive, then active. The research determined passive learning is the least effective in promoting learning.

It’s important to note, however, that the quality of discussion between group members is key. As the paper states, previous research has shown that “the effectiveness of interactive activities depends on factors such as the degree of interactivity, the degree of student knowledge construction, and students’ willingness to challenge or criticize each other.”

In addition, the recent research found that for shallow questions that don’t require deep inference, interactive learning may not offer additional benefits over constructive.

“Differentiated Overt Learning Activities for Effective Instruction in Engineering Classrooms” appeared in the July 2013 issue of the Journal of Engineering Education.

MORE Issue 3 2024 ARTICLES
2024 Scholarship Winners
Introducing the 2024 NSPE Scholarship Winners

Issue 3 2024

Protected Content
NSPE Supports the Next Generation

Summer 2023

Protected Content
Winter 2023 Students Article
Raising the Bar for STEM Excellence

Winter 2023

Protected Content
Scholarship Winners
NSPE Announces Scholarship Winners

Winter 2023

Protected Content
Purdue Offers Nation’s First Semiconductor Engineering Degrees Program

Summer 2022

Protected Content
New York PE Sponsors New Diversity Scholarship

Spring 2022

Protected Content
Young Students Need Better Science, Engineering Opportunities, Report Says

Winter 2022

Protected Content
Can Digital Technology Spread STEM Interest in Rural America?

Fall 2021

Protected Content
Engineering Programs Adopt Smart Cities Courses

Fall 2021

Protected Content
University Classroom
University of Michigan Engineering Launches Broad Diversity Education Program

Leaders of the University of Michigan’s College of Engineering have approved sweeping plans that will engrain diversity, equity, and inclusion into the education of undergraduates, graduate students, postdoctoral researchers, faculty, and staff.

Protected Content
Engineering’s Three Career Options: Let’s Be Clear

Summer 2021

Protected Content
What Does It Take to Achieve Engineering Success?

Spring 2021

Protected Content