Skip to main content
May 2018
South Carolina PEs Continue Battle Against Piping Bill
PE Report

May/June 2018

PE Report
South Carolina PEs Continue Battle Against Piping Bill

In South Carolina, the campaign continues against a bill that risks undermining the judgment of professional engineers when selecting the best materials for public works projects.

While the legislation doesn’t specifically prevent engineers from using their judgment, the South Carolina Society of Professional Engineers believes that it opens the door for challenges to an engineer’s decision about materials. Potential challenges, according to SCSPE, could slow down or halt projects, therefore adding to the costs of the projects and requiring more taxpayer money. SCSPE also believes the bill is unnecessary because it merely presents a solution looking for a problem.

The measure (H. 3652) specifically states that all piping materials that comply with sound engineering practices and meet project requirements as determined by an engineer, employed or retained by a governmental body or any political subdivision, can be considered during the bidding process. Approved by the House in March, the bill would apply when a government agency is procuring piping materials for a water supply, wastewater, stormwater, or storm drainage project for which state funds are used. The legislation wouldn’t prohibit an agency official or an engineer from choosing a material for a project at his or her discretion.

SCSPE and organizations like the South Carolina Water Quality Association oppose this legislation, while the American Chemistry Council supports it.

Over the years, NSPE has worked with state societies to defeat legislation that would limit the professional engineer’s independent judgment when making decisions about the proper type of piping. Similar versions of this legislation have been introduced in states including Indiana, Ohio, and Michigan. The professional engineer’s foremost responsibility is to protect the public health, safety, and welfare. Professional engineers are already obligated to choose the right piping material, based on experience, expertise, qualifications, and the applied knowledge of engineering principles.

MORE Issue 1 2025 ARTICLES
Fracis Scott Key Bridge Collapse
NTSB Offers Safety Recommendations For Vulnerable US Bridges

On March 26, 2024, the Francis Scott Key Bridge in Baltimore collapsed after being struck by a 98

Protected Content
Professional
Do You Live in a Highly Innovative State?

If you reside in a state with high numbers of STEM professionals and technical companies, it’s li

Protected Content
Workforce Bill Article
NSPE Rallies Grassroots Support For Federal Workforce Bill

The Freedom to Invest in Tomorrow’s Workforce Act (H.R. 1151 / S.

Protected Content
Engineering Tech Info Graphic
NSPE Updates Licensure Position on Engineering Technology Programs

NSPE has updated its position statement on licensure and professional qualifications (No.

Protected Content
Business Team on a Video Call
Critical Role of Licensing Boards Backed by Voters

American voters believe that licensing keeps the public safe and is essential to guaranteeing pro

Protected Content
Construction Area
New York State Approves Pay Increases for Design Professionals

To boost recruitment and retention in New York State agencies, Governor Kathy Hochul recently ann

Protected Content
ACEC
City of San Diego Honored For Prioritizing QBS

The City of San Diego was honored with the 2024 QB

Protected Content
Mutal Agreement
NCEES and Engineering Council-UK Sign MRA

Issue 3 2024

Protected Content
SSI Shield
NICET SSI Certification Program Begins Pilot Testing

Issue 3 2024

Protected Content
Workforce
NSPE Joins Forces to Tackle Workforce Shortage

Issue 3 2024

Protected Content
Guam
Guam Civil Engineering Program Gains Accreditation

Issue 3 2024

Protected Content
Glossary of Terms
NSPE Resource to Attract and Retain Engineering Talent

Spring 2024

Protected Content