Skip to main content
June 2014
Where Does Power Come From?
Leading Insight

June 2014

CONCEPTS
Where Does Power Come From?

BY AUSTIN LIN, E.I.T.

AUSTIN LIN, E.I.T.A year after he left presidential office, Teddy Roosevelt arrived in Paris in 1910 and gave his now famous “Man in the Arena” speech as part of a larger address to the crowds at the prestigious Sorbonne, the precursor to the modern University of Paris:

It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs, who comes short again and again, because there is no effort without error and shortcoming; but who does actually strive to do the deeds; who knows great enthusiasms, the great devotions; who spends himself in a worthy cause; who at the best knows in the end the triumph of high achievement, and who at the worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who neither know victory nor defeat.

The journey of engineers, from academic education to EIT/PE licensure to the struggles encountered during their careers, is filled with successes and failures. But that is where the engineer grows in experience, leadership, and power.

For the time being, let’s forego that image of power portrayed by Zeus throwing lightning bolts off a mountaintop.

When we say power, we mean the way in which influence is exerted toward obtaining personal and professional results. Professional engineers in particular use the keel of ethics to concentrate that idea of power into the areas where it serves the greatest societal good.

But how else can power be characterized? Is it sheer expertise? Is it authority resulting from title or position? Is it the ability to stay “in the arena” and not just strive valiantly, but to do so successfully?

American scientist David McClelland, a professor of psychology at Harvard and later at Boston University, classified power into two categories: p-power and s-power.

P-power (or personal power) is defined as the need for power as attributable toward accomplishing personal life goals. P-power views life as a zero-sum game and that the world can fall into only one of two categories: winners and losers.

S-power (or societal power) is defined as the need for power in order to secure goals and advancement for an entire society, for a greater good. S-power holds a moral standard at its heart and applies power toward results that have a wider benefit toward society as a whole.

The writer Ian Robertson, in his book The Winner Effect: The Neuroscience of Success and Failure, implies that the true victor in the arena needs a balance of both p-power and s-power, or as he states, s-power tames p-power.

A man climbing logsRoosevelt tells us that power does not exclusively emerge from one person winning at the cost of another person losing. Rather, true power is a latent trait, revealed as a result of one person’s individual encounters with both winning and losing. Those incremental outcomes cumulatively establish the platform of experience and wisdom that allow for the successful acquisition of results. Power is a result, a sense of adaptability in the face of a great challenge.

The progression of a professional engineer’s career is a constant exchange between one’s p-power and s-power. P-power is the strength to drive one’s professional mastery and capability-building in the solution of engineering problems. S-power is the reflection of that personal intent, creating the engineering outcomes that benefit the public well-being. S-power is the obligation to protect society while being dedicated to its advancement.

The power that engineers possess can be derived from those “great devotions”: technological advances scaled across society. Society’s success is advanced by the new highway interchange that connects cities faster; the wetlands projects that protect natural resources; the new manufacturing plants producing safer, more fuel-efficient cars; the data networks that bring people together, closer, across regional and national boundaries.

Power is not a weapon wielded in war, it’s how the war itself is fought.

And the arena is huge.

NSPE member Austin Lin, E.I.T., is the author of NSPE’s Young Engineers blog.

 

 

MORE Issue 4 2024 ARTICLES
April 2024 Leading Insight
Three Keys to Leading Multigenerational Teams

Mark Cook

Submitted by barbaraellenparker on
Mark
Cook
,

Amelia Yant

Submitted by barbaraellenparker on
Amelia
Yant

Today more than ever, engineers are challenged by collaborating with coworkers who bring differen

Protected Content
Leadership Session NSPECon24
A Blueprint to Authentic Leadership

Issue 3 2024

Protected Content
ELP
Introducing the 2024 Class of Emerging Leaders

Spring 2024

Protected Content
LeadingInsightSpring2024
Maximize Your Influence With 10 Tips

Winter 2024

Protected Content
Paving the Way for the Future of Women in Engineering

Summer 2023

Protected Content
Introducing Emotional Intelligence Into the Engineering Equation

Fall 2023
When most people think about engineering, they associate it with problem solving, decision making, or possessing incredible math skills.

Protected Content
Want Gen Z Talent to Stick Around? Help Them Access Their Upper Brain

Spring 2023

Protected Content
Happy People
Rethinking DEI: How to Build an Inclusion System That Actually Gets Results

Winter 2023

The Pull of Purpose

Summer 2022

Protected Content
Who Should Run Your Mentoring Program?

Spring 2022

Protected Content
How Focusing on Team Development Can Help Your Company Thrive in the New Year

Winter 2022

Protected Content
Strategic Planning in a Postvaccine World

Fall 2021

Protected Content