Skip to main content
June 2014
How to Curb Unethical Behavior
On Ethics

June 2014

ON ETHICS
How to Curb Unethical Behavior

Is there a fix for dishonest and unethical behavior? A group of Harvard Business School professors explored this question and recently shared their findings on how to mitigate unethical behavior based on moral psychology and behavioral ethics research.

In their white paper Morality Rebooted: Exploring Simple Fixes to Our Moral Bugs, the researchers point out three primary reasons why individuals resort to dishonest and unethical behavior:

  • They engage in unethical behavior without being aware of what they are doing;

  • When they realize they are acting unethically, they fail to recognize that social and situational forces are pushing them to cross ethical boundaries; and

  • Unethical behaviors can be difficult to detect, particularly when observers of the behavior operate under motivated biases. For example, the observers may fear being harmed if they detect others cheating.

The researchers examined two approaches to mitigating unethical behavior: values-oriented approaches and structure-oriented approaches. Values-oriented methods target a person’s internal desire to be ethical. If you remind the person of his or her personal moral fiber or raise the prominence of the ethical values and norms of an organization, connections between values and unethical behaviors increase the psychological costs of wrongdoing. These types of approaches target a wide variety of unethical behaviors, which includes cheating, stealing, and lying.

Structure-oriented strategies involve structuring incentives, tasks, or set of choices to reduce or eliminate the temptation to behave unethically. Structure-oriented approaches are designed to impose external costs of acting unethically in order to make dishonesty more inconvenient to implement or remove unethical options altogether.

For example, to prevent students from cheating on a test, a values-oriented method influences students to be more ethical by reminding them of their ethical identity or of ethical standards through the signing an ethics code or placing a mission statement of the school on the classroom wall. A structure-oriented method to preventing students from cheating would involve changing the design of the exam so that they are less tempted to cheat by forcing students to sit further apart, making the exam questions random in order, or increasing the penalty of being caught.

MORE Issue 4 2024 ARTICLES
Regulartions
Navigating Ethical Responsibilities Amidst Evolving Regulations

Spencer Rojas

Submitted by barbaraellenparker on
Spencer
Rojas
,

Tommy Sokolowski

Submitted by barbaraellenparker on
Tommy
Sokolowski

Given recent legal and regulatory changes, professional engineers face a complex landscape impact

Harry Hughes, PE
Wyoming PE Recaptures Ethics Contest Victory

Issue 3 2024

Protected Content
Public Trust
The Professional Trust Factor

Winter 2024

Protected Content
NSPE Ethics Resources

Fall 2023

Protected Content
How to Avoid Doing Bad Things for Good Reasons: Lessons from a Study of Professional Engineers

Spring 2023

Protected Content
Ethics
A Source of Inspiration

Winter 2023

Protected Content
Ethical Business Culture is Stronger After Pandemic

Spring 2022

Protected Content
Engineering’s Public-Protection Predicament

Winter 2022

Protected Content
Book Takes a Deep Dive into Code of Ethics

Fall 2021

Protected Content
Aspiring Global Engineers Require Unique Ethics Training, Study Says

Summer 2021

Protected Content
The Unnatural But Ethical Act of Admitting Mistakes

Spring 2021

New Ethics Approaches Needed as New Technologies Grow

Winter 2021

Protected Content