Skip to main content
January 2019
NSPE Discourages Proposed EPA Licensing Exemption
NSPE Now

January/February 2019

NSPE Today
NSPE Discourages Proposed EPA Licensing Exemption

Oil, natural gas, or chemical plantNSPE raised objections in December to the proposed elimination of a federal requirement for a PE to review and seal modifications to the systems that capture and route emissions in the oil and gas industry.

The objections were outlined in a public comment to the Environmental Protection Agency, which is reconsidering emission standards for the oil and natural gas sector.

NSPE’s comments come after the National Transportation Safety Board called attention to PE license exemptions as part of its investigation into the September natural gas pipeline explosions in Merrick Valley, Massachusetts. NTSB, after meeting with NSPE, recommended that the state of Massachusetts require PEs to review and approve construction and modification documents for public utility services. NSPE has long advocated for the end of licensing exemptions in cases where the practice of engineering could impact the public health, safety, and welfare.

According to NSPE’s comments to the EPA, the failure of a closed vent system in the oil or natural gas industry could lead to leaks that pollute the air, or increase the risks of explosions.

The reason for the EPA’s proposal to eliminate the requirement, says NSPE, is industry concerns about the availability of PEs, and in particular, PEs who are willing to review and sign design and modification plans for closed vent systems they were not involved in creating. To combat this, the Society recommends that those in the industry who expressed these concerns instead employ full-time professional engineers who would be involved throughout the design process.

According to a report from the Environmental Integrity Project (a nonprofit founded by former EPA attorneys), more than 42,000 tons of sulfur dioxide was released into the air between 2009 and 2011 as a result of “emission events” at oil, natural gas, and chemical plants. That is in addition to controlled emissions that occurred during normal operations. If design and build standards are relaxed, as the EPA is proposing, that number would likely increase. In its own filing regarding these reconsiderations, the EPA acknowledged that the proposed changes would result in increased air pollution that would “adversely affect health and welfare….”

Instead, NSPE is urging the EPA to support the high standards set for PEs and hold fast to its purpose of protecting the environment and the safety and welfare of the public.

MORE Issue 1 2025 ARTICLES
NSPE Past President Robert C. Gibson, P.E., F. NSPE
IN MEMORIAM: Robert C. Gibson, P.E., F.NSPE
Protected Content
FE Exam Promo
Pennsylvania FE Exam Program Tackles Licensed Engineer Shortage

The Pennsylvania Engineering Foundation’s (PEF) "Take the FE Exam" program isn’t just about helpi

Protected Content
2025 NSPE Fellows
Meet the 2025 NSPE Fellows

NSPE is proud to welcome the 2025 Class of NSPE Fellows—a group of exceptional engineers who have

Protected Content
Graduated Dues Program
Invest in Your Success: NSPE Graduated Dues Program

NSPE membership helps you navigate your career and build for the future.

Protected Content
CharlesTownsend, P.E.
Raleigh PE Receives 2024 New Professional Award

Issue 3 2024

Protected Content
Brian Malm P.E., F.NSPE
Inspiring Connections At #NSPECon24

Issue 3 2024

Protected Content
Workability Wednesdays
Elevate Your Career — WORKability Webinars

Issue 3 2024

Protected Content
Resources about Engineering
Spring Webinar Series On-Demand

Spring 2024

Protected Content
2024 NSPE Fellows
The 2024 Class of Fellows

Spring 2024

Protected Content
EJCDC Promo
EJCDC® Releases Geotechnical Engineering Services Document

Spring 2024

Protected Content
North Carolina State University
NSPECon24: A Spotlight on Innovative Engineering Education

Spring 2024

Protected Content
Collaboration
EJCDC® Docs Focus on Collaboration, Peer Review

Winter 2024