Threats to Professional Licensure: State List
Arizona
Potential Threat
Legislative/Executive Order/Regulatory: Legislative
Bill Number: Arizona S.B. 1142
S.B. 1142 requires amendment of existing occupational licensing regulations, using the “least restrictive” model that assumed market competition is sufficient to protect public health and safety.
Potential Threat
Legislative/Executive Order/Regulatory: Legislative
Bill Number: HB 2231
HB 2231 Requires amendment of existing occupational licensing regulations, using the “least restrictive” model that assumed market competition is sufficient to protect public health and safety.
Potential Threat
Legislative/Executive Order/Regulatory: Legislative
Bill Number: HB 2086
This tracking software legislation mandates that all state contractors use software to verify the amount of time they are working on a state contract. The software tracks total keystroke and mouse event frequency, and records a screenshot at least once every three minutes. It presents significant privacy and security concerns.
Potential Threat
Legislative/Executive Order/Regulatory: Legislative
Bill Number: SCR 1037; SB 1437
SB 1437: Signed by Governor on 4/5/2017
SCR 1037 was a proposed amendment to the Arizona Constitution. This resolution stated that a person has a fundamental right to engage in an occupation or profession. “No state law or rule shall be enacted or enforced that prohibits or regulations a person from engaging in any occupation or profession unless the state law or rule is clearly necessary to protect the public health or safety.”
Potential Threat
Legislative/Executive Order/Regulatory: Executive Order
Bill Number: Executive Order 2017-03
Governor Ducey has made reforming occupational licensing a major focus of his administration. On March 29th 2017, Arizona Gov. Doug Ducey issued an Executive Order requiring all state licensing boards to report on their minimum requirements for obtaining an occupational license. Should those requirements exceed national averages, the order requires that boards justify them in “specific reference to potential harm to individual Arizonans.”


